Apologies if this if this question has been asked before, but i'll go ahead again ask again. Any feedback would be really appreciated
Just some background info quickly. I'm a South African guy, living and working in the middle east. Dubai to be exact. We have a small skim scene here, but its growing rapidly. Here's our facebook group link, check it out: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=15835172257
The waves we get in Dubai are smaller and weaker than most other places in the world. It makes skimming a challenge as the waves are often a bit far from shore and usually too weak to skim directly towards. For this reason, we skim more at a side angle. To summarize, the further one can skim, the better the session. Check this out: http://www.vimeo.com/18425599
I recently got my hands on a brand-spanking-new victoria poly carbon XL, which should be more than sufficient for my weight (88 kgs) but i'm really struggling to get distance on it. My mate got a Tex Haines L at the same time, and when ridden side-by-side, it performs better than the carbon. The carbon is a high performance board, but would i be correct in saying that it isn't ideal for these conditions? The board i was riding before the carbon is slightly smaller, but has less rocker - and actually gets more drift?
And then the real question is: What would be the ideal core / rails / rocker / material and size combination for having a board that prioritizes drift and distance (rather than wave riding) to reach waves which are further, and once caught, to have more float when riding them? In my opinion, i would say the Tex Haines has got the ideal shape and technical specification for this situation - but for my weight i would need to custom make an XL as it currently only comes in large.
Any feedback welcome??
Cheers, Sean.




Reply With Quote
with the board you can ride any wave, but a smaller, normal shape board is faster when reaching a wave



Bookmarks