yes there is, if i wanted a system that i had to wait 2 months everytime the piece of shit breaks id buy xbox, if i wanted a system that runs on last gen format discs id buy xbox, if i wanted to play a buncha generic shooters id play xbox...halo is over rated, every single one of xbox's games all have been done before, drakes fortune is an awesome game, resistance is cool, killzone's graphics are pretty much unbeatable, and i could give a shit and a quarter less about halo...its overrated, the only game that xbox has that truely impresses me is bioshock, and if you know anything about economics, it doesnt pay for ANY company to not go multiplatform, its economiclly unsound to do such, why make 10 million when i can make 35 to put it on 2 systems? and eventually xbox is going to be limited by its small information size on shitty dvd's....so idk what your trying to proove? your basiclly saying xbox is better because it has a bunch generic overrated fps's.... halo is played out and boring, plus your forgetting about all the shit the ps3 comes with making it a far superior system, as well as superior processing power, i mean look at hd-dvd's, yes great investment microsoft -_- atleast ps3 has some kind of assortment in its games like i said, xbox's entire lineup consists of nothing but fps's. instead of using logic your just going straight to fanboyism, ps3 literally has everygame xbox does except for maybe what? 15 or so exclusives...all fps's.