I am a legend holy****

**RavesIsBack** · 12-16-2007, 10:45 PM

swing and a miss on that one BART

just saying

**junwin** · 12-16-2007, 10:46 PM

Originally Posted by RavesIsBack

1. The compliment was to BART, the fact that he helped you against me I took as a compliment

2. MAYBE THATS BECAUSE YOUR DUMBASS POSTED A DIFFERENT QUOTE???? did you ever think about that smart guy? If I quoted something you wrote and then made a comment about it, wouldnt you think I was talking about the quote? are you fracking serious right now or just that stupid? I am really unsure and that should make you nervous.

3. I made a joke about ass pounding regarding Heath Ledger, that you ignored, then I made a comment to Narwhal, that you addressed, regarding the fact that ITS A TRAILER and Jack's Joker is iconic. I dont even like Jack that much, other than Batman, the Shining, and the Departed, but it was YOUR love of Ledger that I called out FIRST (again you are a step behind). I in fact liked Ledger in Knight's Tale and the Patriot and I hope he does well as Joker, but every one is jumping all over A TRAILER when I just said, lets wait and see.

4. I am glad you finally understand giving credit where its due. IF anything comes out of this conversation, it at least will be that I saved you the hardship of getting expelled from Kangaroo U. for plagiarism. BUT I guess plagiarism is just a spoof of what someone else said right?

1. Great, i wasnt actually talking about you complimenting me or BART... i was saying that you thinking im not funny is pretty much guaranteed when you are arguing with me.

2. Wrong. Go back through the thread. go to Reply #58. I DIDNT QUOTE ANYONE. Get your facts straight before you call me a dumbass.

3. I addressed you being in a bad mood. Then you said "you started it" (really mature), then i refferred to the post you made against me. Its not that hard to grasp is it? And being a step behind? Are you saying you wanted me to come in the thread and start bashing you about loving Jack for no reason? No thanks, ill leave that to you since youre so damn good at it.

4. For a grown up, its surprising you still have no fracking clue as to the difference between plagiarism and parody. And seriously... Kangaroo U? frack, i dont think you ever have the right to say im not witty when you conjure up gems like that.

**BART** · 12-16-2007, 10:49 PM

Originally Posted by RavesIsBack

swing and a miss on that one BART

just saying

i know you'd say that regardless, because it's your go-to pitch.

**narwhal** · 12-16-2007, 10:50 PM

Ravesisreallyback

It's good to have you back.

**BART** · 12-16-2007, 10:53 PM

narwhal you sure look hot in that cheerleader's outfit

**Tony** · 12-16-2007, 10:53 PM

just saw it tonight. i want to find the courage he had to never give up no matter how bad it seems.

**beachbum** · 12-16-2007, 10:53 PM

im fracking lost with this arguement.

i read kangaroo U and broke out laughing. epic. ...frack, i dont think I ever have the right to say youre not witty when you conjure up gems like that.

**RavesIsBack** · 12-16-2007, 10:56 PM

Originally Posted by BART

i know you'd say that regardless, because it's your go-to pitch.

they are who we thought they were?

**narwhal** · 12-16-2007, 10:57 PM

Bart- nah I was actually taking an ax to Rave's balls earlier this week in him "losing his touch". Remember the good ol' days where Raves and Dzan had knives to each others throats. Now they agree on issues and then Raves calmed down on attacking people. The best days were in fact his first where he challenged anyone to a debate about anything. But then he lost his balls but theres a slight stock rise tonight. (lets hope it stays)

**junwin** · 12-16-2007, 11:02 PM

Originally Posted by beachbum

...frack, i dont think I ever have the right to say youre not witty when you conjure up gems like that.

dude thats plagiarism

EDIT: lol narwhal for a second there i thought you said "he lost his balls but theres a slight cock rise tonight"

**RavesIsBack** · 12-16-2007, 11:04 PM

Originally Posted by junwin

1. Great, i wasnt actually talking about you complimenting me or BART... i was saying that you thinking im not funny is pretty much guaranteed when you are arguing with me.

2. Wrong. Go back through the thread. go to Reply #58. I DIDNT QUOTE ANYONE. Get your facts straight before you call me a dumbass.

3. I addressed you being in a bad mood. Then you said "you started it" (really mature), then i refferred to the post you made against me. Its not that hard to grasp is it? And being a step behind? Are you saying you wanted me to come in the thread and start bashing you about loving Jack for no reason? No thanks, ill leave that to you since youre so damn good at it.

4. For a grown up, its surprising you still have no fracking clue as to the difference between plagiarism and parody. And seriously... Kangaroo U? frack, i dont think you ever have the right to say im not witty when you conjure up gems like that.

1. I give credit where its due. I dont say its unfunny unless i think its unfunny. if i think its funny I will either say so or just ignore it.

2. I quoted your exact post to me that I answered. post 45 jackass. you quoted me and i responded later to that saying that quote was not for you it was for narwhal.

3. the quote wasnt against you it was against Heath, then your post was against me, hence the rest. and my point was I made a comment about you loving your brethren aussie and you were a step behind for claiming I was a "jack fanboy." which was so awfully weak.

4. I rest my case.

**RavesIsBack** · 12-16-2007, 11:05 PM

Originally Posted by narwhal

Bart- nah I was actually taking an ax to Rave's balls earlier this week in him "losing his touch". Remember the good ol' days where Raves and Dzan had knives to each others throats. Now they agree on issues and then Raves calmed down on attacking people. The best days were in fact his first where he challenged anyone to a debate about anything. But then he lost his balls but theres a slight stock rise tonight. (lets hope it stays)

it wasnt that I lost my balls, I just agreed with Dzan, which means I probably lost my mind. Although, frack the Wii, that thing is gay I dont care if it means I agree with Dzan.

People dont have the lopsided ridiculous conversations anymore and try to step to the throne, most seem to recognize the throne and leave it be. Its trippy to me.

**narwhal** · 12-16-2007, 11:07 PM

I think the boards are great right now. I wish some of the senior "smart" guys would step in more but at least "smart" debate is more than usual. I am considering making several fake names just to start debate.

**junwin** · 12-16-2007, 11:12 PM

Originally Posted by RavesIsBack

1. I give credit where its due. I dont say its unfunny unless i think its unfunny. if i think its funny I will either say so or just ignore it.

2. I quoted your exact post to me that I answered. post 45 jackass. you quoted me and i responded later to that saying that quote was not for you it was for narwhal.

3. the quote wasnt against you it was against Heath, then your post was against me, hence the rest. and my point was I made a comment about you loving your brethren aussie and you were a step behind for claiming I was a "jack fanboy." which was so awfully weak.

4. I rest my case.

1. rad
2. Post 45 is still not what i was talking about when i said homo post, we established that a while back, so i still dont get why youre upset that i didnt quote.
3. Again, i really could not care if you think im funny or not. And you cant say "im not even a fan of him......except for..." and then list movies you like him in.
4. it wasnt plagiarism fullstop period exclamation mark

**BART** · 12-16-2007, 11:18 PM

Originally Posted by ravesisback

People dont have the lopsided ridiculous conversations anymore and try to step to the throne, most seem to recognize the throne and leave it be. Its trippy to me.

i figured you just got tired of dropping anonymous bipolar rants in people's rep.

**junwin** · 12-16-2007, 11:20 PM

whats a forum without pointless arguments that dont stop?

**RavesIsBack** · 12-16-2007, 11:25 PM

Originally Posted by junwin

1. rad
2. Post 45 is still not what i was talking about when i said homo post, we established that a while back, so i still dont get why youre upset that i didnt quote.
3. Again, i really could not care if you think im funny or not. And you cant say "im not even a fan of him......except for..." and then list movies you like him in.
4. it wasnt plagiarism fullstop period exclamation mark

1. tubular?
2. Again, you quoted me in post 45 and so I addressed that, then you made the comment about that not being what we were talking about and switched the script. My point was that post was the one where you quoted me talking to Narwhal hence rest. I said that the quote of me in post 45 implies homosexuality the "brokeback secks him lol" which is gay. that spawned this whole debate.
3. no I can, I am a fan of Christian Bale, fan of Gary Oldman, fan of Edward Norton; I am not a fan of Colin Farrell, but I liked him phone booth, not a fan of Jack, but he had 3 great roles in my opinion (never saw one flew over the cuckoo's nest).
4. your only comeback was from BART so you have no reply hence case closed

**junwin** · 12-16-2007, 11:37 PM

Originally Posted by RavesIsBack

1. tubular?
2. Again, you quoted me in post 45 and so I addressed that, then you made the comment about that not being what we were talking about and switched the script. My point was that post was the one where you quoted me talking to Narwhal hence rest. I said that the quote of me in post 45 implies homosexuality the "brokeback secks him lol" which is gay. that spawned this whole debate.
3. no I can, I am a fan of Christian Bale, fan of Gary Oldman, fan of Edward Norton; I am not a fan of Colin Farrell, but I liked him phone booth, not a fan of Jack, but he had 3 great roles in my opinion (never saw one flew over the cuckoo's nest).
4. your only comeback was from BART so you have no reply hence case closed

1. yes, very.
2. i still think "his ass is going to be "bad" from all the ass pounding then yes" is gayer than "brokeback secks him". I thought the obvious difference in gayness would have helped you decipher which post i was talking about. And there was no script switching. My point was still that you were in a bitchy mood, then you seem to think i was being a bitch first. i disagree.
3. eew you liked colin farrell
4. i didnt know we were counting comebacks, but im pretty sure thats not ture. And even so, Bart raised a good point, and its pretty freaking obvious youre wrong.

**RavesIsBack** · 12-16-2007, 11:52 PM

Originally Posted by junwin

1. yes, very.
2. i still think "his ass is going to be "bad" from all the ass pounding then yes" is gayer than "brokeback secks him". I thought the obvious difference in gayness would have helped you decipher which post i was talking about. And there was no script switching. My point was still that you were in a bitchy mood, then you seem to think i was being a bitch first. i disagree.
3. eew you liked colin farrell
4. i didnt know we were counting comebacks, but im pretty sure thats not ture. And even so, Bart raised a good point, and its pretty freaking obvious youre wrong.

1. indeed
2. this wouldve been true had you not quoted me saying something else in that post hence my point
3. only in phone booth
4. oh its definitely not "ture" true on the other hand it is; look at the definition of plagiarism since i was nice enough to post it and tell me where I am wrong?

**BART** · 12-16-2007, 11:56 PM

Originally Posted by RavesIsBack

4. oh its definitely not "ture" true on the other hand it is; look at the definition of plagiarism since i was nice enough to post it and tell me where I am wrong?

i know! i know! pick me! pick me!

**RavesIsBack** · 12-16-2007, 11:58 PM

say what you want, by definition its not wrong; parody might be the better word if it was a sad, abysmal attempt at humor, but he stole my words and ideas hence not wrong.

**junwin** · 12-16-2007, 11:59 PM

Originally Posted by RavesIsBack

1. indeed
2. this wouldve been true had you not quoted me saying something else in that post hence my point
3. only in phone booth
4. oh its definitely not "ture" true on the other hand it is; look at the definition of plagiarism since i was nice enough to post it and tell me where I am wrong?

1. mmm quite
2. my point is that either way, you saying i was a bitch first is wrong.
3. still.. ew
4. well i never passed it off as my own words, because i admitted that i was using your words anyway. And i think you should look at the definition of parody that i posted, and show me how it isnt one. (and you cant say 'its not funny', because Scary Movie 4 is a Parody and that movie sucked.)

**RavesIsBack** · 12-17-2007, 12:08 AM

Originally Posted by junwin

1. mmm quite
2. my point is that either way, you saying i was a bitch first is wrong.
3. still.. ew
4. well i never passed it off as my own words, because i admitted that i was using your words anyway. And i think you should look at the definition of parody that i posted, and show me how it isnt one. (and you cant say 'its not funny', because Scary Movie 4 is a Parody and that movie sucked.)

1. let me come aboard your ship so we can exchange monosyllabic expressions of arrogance in person
2. i wasnt saying that, i was saying that my insult was first to heath ledger but your reply was at me; you attacked me hence the response
3. yea I am not proud of it either
4. Scary Movie 4 had its moments (correction a moment)

**junwin** · 12-17-2007, 12:15 AM

Originally Posted by RavesIsBack

1. let me come aboard your ship so we can exchange monosyllabic expressions of arrogance in person
2. i wasnt saying that, i was saying that my insult was first to heath ledger but your reply was at me; you attacked me hence the response
3. yea I am not proud of it either
4. Scary Movie 4 had its moments (correction a moment)

1. access granted
2. heath and i are tight yo. i stand up for my niggas, this is how we do. (that was my attempt at being black)
3. colin also has some things hes not proud of

dont judge me because of my membership to queerclick.com

4. I saw it for the Shaq cameo, worst 10 dollars i ever spent.

EDIT: the argument is dieing out, say something provocative

**RavesIsBack** · 12-17-2007, 12:21 AM

Originally Posted by junwin

EDIT: the argument is dieing out, say something provocative

i wear women's underwear.

**junwin** · 12-17-2007, 12:25 AM

and you sit down to pee?

**RavesIsBack** · 12-17-2007, 12:26 AM

only in public to not make a sound

**junwin** · 12-17-2007, 12:32 AM

Youre supposed to make the loudest sound possible, so people think you have a huge dick. Sometimes i bring in a water bottle to pump up the volume.

**RavesIsBack** · 12-17-2007, 12:37 AM

but then they know you went into a stall to take a piss

**BART** · 12-17-2007, 12:38 AM

Originally Posted by junwin

Youre supposed to make the loudest sound possible, so people think you have a huge dick. Sometimes i bring in a water bottle to pump up the volume.

seems to me a big dick would make it quieter = less distance to the bowl.

**narwhal** · 12-17-2007, 12:39 AM

Oh shit.

**BART** · 12-17-2007, 12:41 AM

and a shit quieter yet, especially if you have an oblong shaped ass

**narwhal** · 12-17-2007, 12:44 AM

shaped ass has nothing to do with the sound of shit hitting water, Bart.

You're missing the key elements here:

-asshole size- this in fact determines shape and speed of crap coming out the asshole

-what the person ate

-How much push the person is putting into this shit....

-shape would be far last

**RavesIsBack** · 12-17-2007, 12:44 AM

actually a shaped ass has something to do with it

it closes the opening in the resonance chamber and if your ass were large enough to cover the entire hole then you would have no sound