Should adult men be able to bang 14 year olds? was: Meet me in the chat ASAP

[beezy]

Go!

[beezy]

9:29 PM [VictoriaScrub] whatup beez
9:30 PM [VictoriaScrub] haha
9:30 PM [beezy] what up victoria
9:30 PM [VictoriaScrub] i hate that lol face
9:30 PM [beezy] a/s/l?
9:30 PM [beezy] pic?
9:30 PM [VictoriaScrub] ?
9:30 PM [VictoriaScrub] *choochoo*
9:30 PM [beezy] u got a boyfriend?
9:30 PM [VictoriaScrub] i have a gf
9:31 PM [VictoriaScrub] lol
9:31 PM [beezy] awesome
9:31 PM tcmarkley has left the chat.
9:31 PM [beezy] i love girl on girl action
9:31 PM [VictoriaScrub] r u aa dude?
9:31 PM [VictoriaScrub] well obviously
9:31 PM [VictoriaScrub] i am too
9:32 PM [beezy] u r too what
9:32 PM [VictoriaScrub] a guy
9:32 PM [beezy] wtf..noooooooooooo
9:32 PM [VictoriaScrub] yeah
9:32 PM [beezy] man, i was thinkin about havin sex with u too
9:32 PM [VictoriaScrub] youve been hitting on a sixteenyear old guy
9:32 PM [VictoriaScrub] how do you feel
9:32 PM [beezy] gross
9:32 PM [VictoriaScrub] hahahaha
9:32 PM [beezy] man now dateline NBC is gonna be after me
9:33 PM [VictoriaScrub] any second now
9:33 PM [beezy] what type of man has the name victoria
9:33 PM [VictoriaScrub] i man who rides a victoria
9:33 PM [VictoriaScrub] skimboard
9:33 PM [VictoriaScrub] ......
9:34 PM [beezy] i dont feel comfortable in here any more, we have a 16yo dude with a girls name and a blak skimmer who is butt ass naked chasin a cat around with cool whip on his dick
9:35 PM [VictoriaScrub] hahahahhaahhahahahaha

[veniceskim4]

Ahaha, you gays are so silly.

[Blak_skimmer220]

9:34 PM [beezy] i dont feel comfortable in here any more, we have a 16yo dude with a girls name and a blak skimmer who is butt ass naked chasin a cat around with cool whip on his dick

WTF? i wasnt even in there for half the time

[beezy]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HpIuQrhcC0

[BART]

camouflage officer

aahah

[lunarone]

what, the, F**********************K??????????

i can't believe he sat there in a towel, and talked to that proud ass mother f**cker... i woulda f**kin gone out swinging, f**k that stupid fat ass 14 yr old.

that shit was the most f**ked up thing i have ever seen. F**K that NBC guy, F**K his cat too...

damn that whole thing pissed me off, so many f**ked up people

[BART]

uh, i'm glad you feel bad for the pederast

[lunarone]

of course i feel bad for him. It's awful that anyone would do something like try to have sex with a 14 yr old... but hell, R Kelly pissed on a 15 yr old, and he was never on NBC DATELINE with some guy that walks out of the girls room and says, what the f**k are you doing Robert Kelly?

and the whole main reason is probably because he never gets laid and he is just trying to get by with whatever he can, and maybe he thought this stupid slutty 14 yr old was okay with having sex with whoever she can, because we all know they are out there.

the whole video was full of f**ked up people, nobody should have been doing what was done and this video should not even exist. everyone in it was f**kin awful at life.

[BART]

you're saying he's interested in 14 year old girls because he never gets laid, and i disagree with you. he has a fetish for 14-year olds, and our communities have determined that 14-year olds need to be protected. he has a sexual fetish that often creates a pretador/victim relationship--most 14-year olds need the protection of the community to have their sexual space. i agree that sexuality is a complex thing, but this has nothing to do with him not being able to get poon.

as far as the circus of NBC dateline, i think it's funny, but i agree it is an odd form of entertainment.

edit: typo, bitch

[lunarone]

I'd like to quote Dave Chappelle now by asking..

"How old is 15, really?"

I disagree with 14 yr olds needing protection on a sexual level from peers. Hell, when I was 14, I knew whether or not I wanted to have sex with a 20 year old or not, and I knew who I should be talking to and where I should hang out if I didn't.

P.S. this is fun

[BART]

I disagree with 14 yr olds needing protection on a sexual level from peers.

a 26 year old (or however old he was) is not a peer.

[HandsomeJonneh]

i'm in the chat but beezy isn't

[veniceskim4]

Its completely fracked up for people to be doing that stuff but you can't help but laugh at some of it.
"You can keep the towel."
"Aaaah, I think I'll just leave it in the laundry room."

[jake]

barts g/f is a trooopper

[BART]

hell yes

[HandsomeJonneh]

Whered Bart Go?

[jake]

get his grub on. his woman made dinner AND brought him a beer

[lunarone]

a 26 year old (or however old he was) is not a peer.

but this 26 year old (or however old he was) was in the same shoes as the girl, both trying for some action and both moving along the same path. therefore, peer.
peer2 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pîr)
n.
A person who has equal standing with another or others, as in rank, class, or age: children who are easily influenced by their peers.

[AerialSkimmerBrad]

Im not aloud to talk to strangers..plus I dont want you to have sex with me cuz Im a dude too. PLEASE DONT HIT ON ME!

[BART]

but this 26 year old (or however old he was) was in the same shoes as the girl, both trying for some action and both moving along the same path. therefore, peer.

that is not the meaningful definition of a peer at all. you've asserted and highlighted part of the definition, but have not highlighted the part of the definition that is qualifying. you wrote:

peer2 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (pîr)
n.
A person who has equal standing with another or others, as in rank, class, or age:children who are easily influenced by their peers.

"as in rank, class, or age" is the qualifying portion of the definition. How is a 26-year old adult in the same rank, class, or age as an 14-year old child? rank = no. class = no. age = def not. they are clearly not by any meangingful defnition that i can see. a 26-year old has the physical and social maturity far beyond that of a 14-year old, which in a sexual situation is clearly unequal. whether a 14-year old (or a 7 year-old for that matter) is curious about fracking, that curiosity does not qualify them as a peer to an adult, especially within the common use of the term 'peer' (which is age). period. the fact that they are not peers in any meaningful way is precisely the point.

edit: typo, i hate the little note tell at the bottom.

[lunarone]

Rank? As I said before, at 14 years old, I knew what was wrong and what was not. I'd classify a whored up 14 year old about the same as I would see a desperate 26 year old, looking for sex in any place possible.

Class? They both "want" to have "sex". And by all means, many 26 year olds are not as socially mature as you are implying.

Age... It's not even worth talking about because clearly they don't match here.

I see them standing about equal in enough things to consider themselves peers. When you go surfing or skimming with people that may be 20 years your elder or 20 years younger... You are trying to say that these people wouldn't be your peers even though they influence you in ways that are not unlike peers? A peer can be anyone that is in your daily life that you talk to or associate with.

-edit-
P.S.

I'm going to post this before someone else does. But we aren't arguing, we're conversing.
-
"Arguing on message boards is like participating in the Special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded..."

[HandsomeJonneh]

i think you're both pedaphiles

questions?

[Blak_skimmer220]

no Mr. Jonny

[CaboWabo]

Rank? As I said before, at 14 years old, I knew what was wrong and what was not. I'd classify a whored up 14 year old about the same as I would see a desperate 26 year old, looking for sex in any place possible.

Class? They both "want" to have "sex". And by all means, many 26 year olds are not as socially mature as you are implying.

Age... It's not even worth talking about because clearly they don't match here.

I see them standing about equal in enough things to consider themselves peers. When you go surfing or skimming with people that may be 20 years your elder or 20 years younger... You are trying to say that these people wouldn't be your peers even though they influence you in ways that are not unlike peers? A peer can be anyone that is in your daily life that you talk to or associate with.

-edit-
P.S.

I'm going to post this before someone else does. But we aren't arguing, we're conversing.
-
"Arguing on message boards is like participating in the Special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded..."

Doesn't make it ok and its still illegal and that does not make them 'peers'. A whored up 14 y/o still has a chance to be a normal decent person...a 26 y/o pedaphile has a problem that will most likely not be resolved.

[BART]

Rank? As I said before, at 14 years old, I knew what was wrong and what was not. I'd classify a whored up 14 year old about the same as I would see a desperate 26 year old, looking for sex in any place possible.

Class? They both "want" to have "sex". And by all means, many 26 year olds are not as socially mature as you are implying.

Age... It's not even worth talking about because clearly they don't match here.

I see them standing about equal in enough things to consider themselves peers. When you go surfing or skimming with people that may be 20 years your elder or 20 years younger... You are trying to say that these people wouldn't be your peers even though they influence you in ways that are not unlike peers? A peer can be anyone that is in your daily life that you talk to or associate with.

-edit-
P.S.

I'm going to post this before someone else does. But we aren't arguing, we're conversing.
-
"Arguing on message boards is like participating in the Special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded..."

Bringing up this surfing metaphor to illustrate what a peer can be doesn't really mean anything. We're all peers in that we're all humans. So what?

The term 'peer' implies equality, but is also specific to the meaningful properties of the relationship. You cannot imply that the participants are equal in a meaningful way simply because they are both consensual. A 26-year old and a 14-year old from a perspective of responsibility, social capacity, and physiology, are not equal. All of those things come into essential play in a sexual relationship. Those are the terms that are important in a sexual relationship to define what a peer is and is not. One is an adult, one is a child. We make the distinction of child vs adults for various reasons. Most of those reasons are prime examples why an adult should not solicit sex from a 14-year old.

Furthermore, we place and expect responsibility in adults to protect, rather than exploit adolescents during their development.

You also seem oblivious to the evidence of what I'm saying. Look at the vast numbers of people who have been severely damaged by child-adult sexual relationships (whether consenual or not).

I think the reasons are pretty clear.

p.s.

I'm going to post this before someone else does. But we aren't arguing, we're conversing.
-
"Arguing on message boards is like participating in the Special Olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded..."

people here get it, that's not neccessary.

[Doctor Delicious]

Bart, the only reason your saying this is obviously because you have never had sex with a 14 year old. Lunarone has and you're just jealous.

[HandsomeJonneh]

hahahahaha Micah is the greatest seriously

[Teddy Parker]

hey the chat isnt working for me...?

[BART]

Bart, the only reason your saying this is obviously because you have never had sex with a 14 year old. Lunarone has and you're just jealous.

the only time i wanted to bang a 14-year old was when i was 12-15. the older i get the older my taste in women is. weird how that works.

[HandsomeJonneh]

the younger i get the more i wish i was older

[superskimcdy]

wow thats perverted

[BART]

when is sex not perverted, ydb

[marcyman]

when you are married

[lunarone]

Well... This 26 year old obviously isn't as completely responsible, mature, or as normal as the 26 year old that you are talking about, Bart. He wouldn't be looking for sex online and in the sleezy way that he is. He wouldnt be talking about cats and sex, a dead giveaway that he isn't right in the head.

There have been 15 year olds put to life in jail for murder, but yet this 14 year old can't be considered adult enough to know what she is doing, leading this 26 year old on to propose sex with him, and a cat? Sounds like a typical cast of unsocial freaks looking for something to do with their pitiful social lives to me.

The whole stipulation that he went through with the NBC newscaster could be a lawsuit in itself. It's called cruel and unusual punishment... He simply didnt need to go to the extent that he did, humiliating the 26 yr old on national television, naked in a towel. If he could find a good lawyer he could easily sue and win that case and walk away with a ridiculous amount of money. That was bigtime overkill for what actually HAPPENED. There is no proof that he was going to actually do anything that he had said on the internet. All that needed to be done was that he should have simply been arrested for was proposition for sex with a whorish 14 year old.

I don't agree with men having sex with 14 year olds, but I also don't agree on a pedaphilic setup with slut-like juveniles because you never really know for sure what is going on. God knows there are sluts at age 14 and if you havent met one, well you have just been walking on blessed land.

I had a very good professional skateboarder friend of mine, Carl Naegele, go to jail for 4 years for the near same reason of having sex with a 14 yr old. Everyone knew that she was a slut, and she had been around the block a time or two... His initial sentence was 15 years, but luckily all of his close crew went and testified against her, because she always hung out around his ramps in his backyard. He only got 4 years. So clearly, even the judiciaries know that there are always exceptions for the average 14 year old.

carry on.